ILC Goals and Objectives
The Libraries
Information Literacy Curriculum (ILC) Goals and Objectives represent
the
skills and competencies required of an information literate individual.
A coordinated approach to information literacy, integrated into the curricula
of the schools and departments throughout the University, will serve to
prepare all Purdue students with the ability to identify, locate, evaluate
and utilize information resources effectively throughout their lives.
Goal
1. User understands the role, value, and power of information in modern
society.
Objective
1. User understands the importance and process of scholarly communication.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Within an academic discipline, the user
can identify characteristics of scholarly communication.
- Enabling
Objective 2. Within an academic discipline, the user
can identify the stages of scholarly communication.
- Enabling
Objective 3. Within an academic discipline, the user
can describe the significance of scholarly communication.
Objective
2. User understands the role information plays in industry.
- Enabling
Objective 1.
Within
industry, the user can illustrate how information supports decision-making
(e.g. case studies).
- Enabling Objective 2. Given an industry-related
task, the user can identify and obtain critical information to support
the decision-making process.
Objective
3. User knows how governments and organizations such as professional societies,
universities, etc. generate and distribute information.
- Enabling
Objective 1.
Given
an information need, the user can identify government agencies and organizations
that generate and disseminate relevant information.
- Enabling Objective 2. For a particular information
need, the user can identify types of information produced by governments
and organizations.
Objective
4. User appreciates how information may be used to improve one's quality
of life.
- Enabling
Objective 1.
Given
a variety of information sources, the user can identify and distinguish
the importance of information for vocational, personal, and recreational
purposes.
- Enabling Objective 2. Given
certain career and/or personal goals or objectives, the user can describe
what and how information benefits his/her professional and personal
lives.
- Enabling Objective 3. Upon
successful attainment of information skills, the user will develop interests
in enhancing information skills to engage in life-long learning.
Objective
5. User comprehends the globalization of information.
- Enabling
Objective 1.
Having examined
a variety of information resources, the user can identify culture-bound
characteristics of information.
- Enabling Objective 2. Given an area
of interest, the user can identify resources that refer to information
sources in a variety of languages and/or produced in a variety of countries.
- Enabling Objective 3. Having examined
resources representing information from around the world, the user can
determine the scope of coverage of each resource.
- Enabling Objective 4. Given
an area of interest, the user can identify information sources published
in different countries and in different languages.
- Enabling Objective 5. After
completing background instruction for the Internet, the user can explain
the global networking capabilities of the Internet.
- Enabling Objective 6. Within
an area of interest, the user can describe how information technology
may be used to communicate and disseminate information.
Goal
2. User understands and is able to communicate his/her specific need(s)
for information.
Objective
1. User understands the role of information professionals and subject
experts to assist in defining information needs.
- Enabling
Objective 1. For a given research project or assignment,
the user can identify where in the research process it is appropriate
to consult a classroom instructor.
- Enabling
Objective 2. For a given research project or assignment,
the user can identify where in the research process it is appropriate
to consult library staff.
- Enabling
Objective 2a.
User can identify appropriate service points in a library and the role
of the staff in each area.
- Enabling Objective 2b. User recognizes that there
are varying types of libraries with differing levels of staff expertise
(e.g. public libraries, research libraries, special libraries).
- Enabling
Objective 3. For a given research project or assignment,
the user can identify where in the research process outside experts
or sources may assist in topic formulation.
- Enabling
Objective 3a.
The user can identify types of outside experts or sources of information.
- Enabling Objective 3b. The user can identify
two to three sources of information other than the classroom instructor
and library staff which may assist in topic formulation.
Objective
2. The user understands the factors which may determine how an interest
area can be refined and can formulate a topic which can be pursued.
- Enabling
Objective 1. For a given research assignment or project,
the user can state the impact of each of the following factors on his/her
project: timeframe, length of presentation, type of presentation, audience,
cost, availability of information (e.g. local vs. remote, amount published
in field), an approach to topic/perspective (e.g. disciplinary focus,
historical, comparative, theoretical).
- Enabling
Objective 2. Based on user's prior knowledge of a topic
or area of interest, he/she can write a minimum of three questions related
to the topic (e.g. Who? Where? What? How?).
- Enabling
Objective 3. Given an area of interest, user can identify
methods of gathering preliminary information.
- Enabling
Objective 3a.
User can identify one or two essays or articles on the area of interest
in relevant encyclopedia(s), handbook(s), or textbook(s).
- Enabling Objective 3b. User
can locate two to three essays/articles on the area of interest by
browsing relevant journals, magazines, or newspapers.
- Enabling Objective 3c. User
can conduct a quick preliminary search of an index, catalog, or other
database and select two to three titles on a common theme within the
area of interest.
- Enabling
Objective 4. Having gathered background information in
an area of interest, the user can state his/her topic in one sentence,
and can construct broader and narrower statements.
- Enabling
Objective 5. Having formulated a preliminary topic statement,
the user can identify the discipline(s) that would have appropriate
information on the selected topic.
G3.
User understands that information varies in its organization, content
and format.
Objective
1. User understands that information sources may be grouped in a variety
of ways.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Presented with materials of different physical
types, the user can demonstrate the difference between them by grouping
items of the same type together and naming the types (e.g. realia, microfiche,
microfilm, videocassette, CD-ROM, book).
- Enabling
Objective 2. Presented with several items, the user can
name at least two characteristics which distinguish one from another
(e.g. subject, format, publisher, special audience, author, type of
material, frequency of publication).
- Enabling
Objective 3. Given how vocabulary and fields are used
within indexes and abstracts, the user can define "controlled vocabulary."
- Enabling
Objective 4. Within an individual record, the user can
list the parts or access points of that record, which may be used to
provide access to records containing similar information (e.g. author,
title, subject headings, keywords from anywhere in the bibliographic
record).
- Enabling
Objective 5. From index or database records the user
can identify where sources use controlled vocabulary (assigned by an
indexer, cataloger, etc.) as access points, and other access points
(which may be dependent on the resource used and the subject covered).
- Enabling
Objective 6. Given book and journal records, the user
can identify the main elements for a book (author, title, publisher,
place, date) and a journal article (author, title, source, volume, issue,
pages, date).
- Enabling
Objective 7. Given book and journal records, the user
can distinguish between records for a book, a journal, and a journal
article.
- Enabling
Objective 8. After examining a book or article and a
relevant controlled vocabulary list, the user can demonstrate his/her
understanding by determining likely subject headings.
- Enabling
Objective 9. Within an information seeking environment,
the user can define and describe the importance of a classification
system in the arrangement of information.
- Enabling
Objective 9a.
The user can identify two of the classification systems used at Purdue
and explain the basis for each (e.g. Dewey Decimal-hierarchical subject
arrangement; SuDocs-departmental arrangement; theses-arranged by author's
last name).
- Enabling Objective 9b. The
user can recognize an additional classification system that is not
used at Purdue but is commonly used in American academic libraries
(e.g. Library of Congress, National Library of Medicine).
- Enabling Objective 9c. The user
can explain why books on similar subjects may or may not be shelved
together (e.g. classification systems usually pull like subjects together;
classification numbers change over time as interest in or knowledge
on a subject expands or wanes; the book might be misshelved).
- Enabling
Objective 10. Given a brief Dewey Decimal chart, the
user can select probable classification numbers for specific titles.
- Enabling
Objective 11. Within the Purdue Libraries system, the user
can name at least five of the libraries, and list two subject areas
or disciplines that the library probably covers.
- Enabling
Objective 12. The user can describe at least two ways
journals may be arranged within a library and identify at least one
library at Purdue with journals organized in that manner (e.g. call
number order, alphabetically by title, current and bound).
Objective
2. User knows and appreciates the differences between the level of sources
available (primary, secondary, etc.).
- Enabling
Objective 1. Given a list of primary and secondary sources,
the user can mark which ones are primary and which ones are secondary.
- Enabling
Objective 2. In a given area of study, the user can identify
and give three examples of primary and secondary sources.
- Enabling
Objective 3. When reviewing a list of primary and secondary
sources, the user can describe the use of indexes and abstracts and
distinguish them from other sources.
Objective
3. User understands how information is structured within an area of interest.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Given a timeline of how information in various
disciplines is produced, the user can place relevant resource types
in the timeline for a given discipline (e.g. lab notes earliest in timeline,
preprints early in timeline, encyclopedias late in timeline, indexes
latest in timeline).
- Enabling
Objective 2. For a given discipline, the user can identify
current awareness tools from a list of resources.
- Enabling
Objective 3. Given a list of topics with various aspects,
a user can identify which databases would be most appropriate for searching
(e.g. business database for marketing aspects of rechargeable batteries,
engineering database for technological aspects of batteries).
- Enabling
Objective 4. After examining the literature of social
sciences/humanities and that of the natural sciences, the user can identify
differences between them. (e.g. monograph vs. periodical intensive,
individual vs. collaborative authorship).
- Enabling
Objective 5. For a given information need, the user will
describe how cited references fit into the research process.
Objective
4. User can distinguish between various treatments of a subject.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Given an article from a popular magazine
and one from a scholarly or trade journal on the same topic, the user
can write at least three differences between the two treatments of the
topic (e.g. format, authors, audience).
- Enabling
Objective 2. Given a journal article and a review article
pertaining to the same subject area, the user can list at least two
differences (e.g. breadth of coverage, original research vs. compilation,
number of references cited).
- Enabling
Objective 3. Given a list of publications criteria, the
user can explain how they differ between a sensational publication and
a reputable news magazine.
- Enabling
Objective 4. Having seen specified sources found on the
Internet, the user can give reasons why one source may be better than
the other (e.g. authorship stated, date source revised is provided).
- Enabling
Objective 5. Given articles on the same topic showing
different points of view, the user can note information about the articles
which, if researched, might help explain the points of view (e.g. biography
of the author/affiliation, types of publications from publisher, place
of publication, period during which published).
- Enabling
Objective 6. Given an article from a magazine for juveniles
and one for adults, the user is able to note three characteristics which
distinguish one from the other. (e.g. language, level, length, detail).
Objective
5. User is aware of the different means by which information may be delivered
(e.g. orally, microform, paper, electronically).
- Enabling
Objective 1. Having seen in class a demonstration and participated
in a discussion of several ways in which information may be delivered,
the user can name four major categories and give a specific example
of an item for each (e.g. oral presentation of a speech, a printed book,
a government document on microfiche, an encyclopedia on CD ROM).
- Enabling
Objective 2. Given a specific number of records, the user
can identify an acceptable number of these as referring to items on
paper, microform, CD ROM, audio tape, video cassette, slides, computer
disk and motion picture.
- Enabling
Objective 3. Given a description of different means of
delivery, the user can list an advantage and disadvantage for each.
Goal
4. User can retrieve information from a variety of systems and in various
formats.
Objective
1. User can create an efficient plan based upon his/her information needs.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Having defined a need, the user can list
at least four types of resources he/she will use (e.g. dictionary, encyclopedia,
OPAC, index, CD-ROM, Internet).
- Enabling
Objective 2. Having refined this need, the user can evaluate
the order in which these types of resources should be consulted for
maximum success (e.g. dictionary, encyclopedia, THOR, index, CD-ROM,
Internet).
- Enabling
Objective 3. Having defined a need, the user can describe
different strategies for finding information (e.g. browsing, keyword
to find subject heading, use of thesaurus, serendipity, directory, general-to-specific
sources, bibliographies, citation indexes).
- Enabling
Objective 4. Upon failure to find useful (or adequate)
information, the user can identify at least one additional strategy
or can modify the existing strategy.
- Enabling
Objective 5. Having defined a need, the user can name
at least two individuals who can provide additional guidance or expertise
in developing an efficient plan. (e.g. librarian, professor, colleague,
subject expert).
- Enabling
Objective 6. Given a specific resource (e.g. a book title),
the user can select at least one appropriate tool to find local holding
or access information.
- Enabling
Objective 7. Having identified specific resources for
a given need, the user can defend a logical order in which they should
be consulted for maximum success.
- Enabling
Objective 8. Having selected a topic, user can describe
his information need in terms of time, types of resources, and alternate
terminology.
Objective
2. User can accurately interpret bibliographic citations.
- Enabling
Objective 1. After basic instruction on the use of citations,
the user can name and define the elements of a basic citation.
- Enabling
Objective 2. If given a list of citations, user can at least
distinguish between a book citation and a journal citation, regardless
of the origin of the citation.
- Enabling
Objective 3. If given a list of citations, user can identify
journal title abbreviations and locate the full titles in appropriate
resources.
- Enabling
Objective 4. If given a list of citations, user can identify
at least two different types of Internet addresses.
Objective
3. User can successfully navigate within the libraries and other information
realms they use.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Given a random list of locally used call numbers,
the user can put them in order.
- Enabling
Objective 2. Having identified the title needed, user
can locate holdings information for books and journals found in the
Purdue Libraries.
- Enabling
Objective 3. When presented with information representing
citations to serial publications, the user can locate the specific article.
- Enabling
Objective 4. When presented with information representing
citations to books or monographs, the user can locate the item(s).
- Enabling
Objective 5. When presented with information representing
specialized publications, the user can locate the item (e.g. patents,
standards, reports).
- Enabling
Objective 6. Within the Purdue Libraries system, the
user can differentiate between the functions of the various library
services or locations and can indicate these areas on a map (e.g. reference,
reserves, information desk, circulation desk, OPAC terminals, journal
shelving, book shelving).
- Enabling
Objective 7. Within an individual library or from a remote
location, the user can complete the log-on procedures for the local
networked systems.
- Enabling
Objective 8. Within the Purdue Libraries system, the user
can demonstrate use of at least two current navigation tools on networked
systems.
- Enabling
Objective 9. Within the Purdue Libraries information
system, the user can identify the types of items which can be retrieved
in at least two of the sections (e.g. THOR; PCAT vs. Index; www).
- Enabling
Objective 10. In his/her area of study, the user can
list titles of at least two appropriate indexes (print and electronic).
- Enabling
Objective 11. Within a given library, the user can describe
the nature of information located in various sections of a library (reference,
reserves, media, indexes and abstracts, OPAC) and can identify one appropriate
resource in at least three of these sections.
- Enabling
Objective 12. Given an information need, the user can
select the appropriate type of library to use based upon his/her information
need (e.g., public, academic, undergraduate, subject-specific).
- Enabling
Objective 13. Given his/her own computer configuration,
the user can identify at least two different ways to gain access to
networked information systems (e.g. dial-in access to OPAC, gopher,
Internet, America On-line).
- Enabling
Objective 14. For items not available at Purdue, the
user can complete an Interlibrary Loan request.
- Enabling
Objective 15. Given a network system, the user can describe
how to access OPACs at other institutions.
Objective
4. User can devise a search based upon the capabilities, structure, and
access points of an information resource.
- Enabling
Objective 1. After examining a new resource, the user
can identify the specific access points (e.g. subject, keyword, title,
author, corporate author, identifier).
- Enabling
Objective 2. Given a specific resource, the user can
identify sources of help for its use (e.g. introduction, preface, help
screens).
- Enabling
Objective 3. Given a specific resource, the user can
identify access points appropriate for a chosen topic.
- Enabling
Objective 4. The user can identify at least two methods
to increase a search vocabulary (e.g. using a thesaurus or partially
successful search to identify synonyms for key search concepts).
- Enabling
Objective 5. Given a specific electronic resource, the
user can determine the capabilities of the search software and the database.
- Enabling
Objective 5a.
The user can give definitions for the Boolean search operators (and,
or, not) and can demonstrate appropriate use in a search.
- Enabling Objective 5b. The
user can give definitions for the proximity operators (with, near,
same, adjacent) and can demonstrate appropriate use in a search statement.
- Enabling Objective 5c. The
user can identify the default operator.
- Enabling Objective 5d. The
user can describe truncation and its value and can identify the symbol
used for the database/search software selected.
- Enabling Objective 5e. The
user can describe how fields are used within databases, identify the
various fields of an electronic record and construct a search strategy
utilizing at least two different field qualifiers to limit search
result retrieval (e.g. language, years, document type).
- Enabling Objective 5f. The
user can apply the concept of controlled vocabulary to maximize search
retrieval in appropriate databases.
- Enabling Objective 5g. The user
can describe the concept of keyword searching and apply it as appropriate.
- Enabling
Objective 6. Given a citation index, the user can trace
a cited reference.
Goal
5. User can evaluate information sources.
Objective
1. User can evaluate the relevance of the information retrieved.
- Enabling
Objective 1. After completing a search for information
in a reference source such as an index or abstract, the user can identify
elements within each record that aid in determining relevance in relationship
to the user's needs for depth of information, language and time frame
(e.g. length, article type, language, date).
- Enabling
Objective 2. After completing a search for information
in a reference source such as an index or abstract, the user can make
basic decisions about the usefulness of the content of the source by
examining the title, subject headings, source, and abstract if available.
- Enabling
Objective 3. After completing a search for information
in a library catalog database the user can identify elements within
each record that aid in determining relevance to the user's needs for
depth of coverage, language and time frame (e.g. date, length, publisher).
- Enabling
Objective 4. After completing a search for information
in a library catalog, the user can make basic decisions about the usefulness
of the content of the source by examining the title, subject headings,
table of contents if included and abstract if available.
- Enabling
Objective 5. After completing a search for information
using Internet based tools, the user can identify elements within each
record that aid in determining relevance to the user's needs for depth
of coverage, language, information format and time frame (e.g. date,
length, origin).
- Enabling
Objective 6. After completing a search for information
using Internet based tools, the user can make basic decisions about
the usefulness of the content of the source by examining the title,
subject headings, and description or abstract if available.
Objective
2. User can identify relevant factors that may constrain their retrieval
of information.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Given an information need, the user can
determine whether the information needed could be obtained free of charge.
If a charge is necessary, the user can estimate the cost within a specified
range.
- Enabling
Objective 2. Given an information need, the user can
estimate the time needed to complete the process and the time available
to obtain the information and create a plan which reflects the constraints
of each.
- Enabling
Objective 3. Given an assignment to find information,
the user can interpret the assignment and identify types of information
that are readily available.
- Enabling
Objective 4. After encountering constraints in retrieving
information, the user can revise the plan for finding information if
necessary.
- Enabling
Objective 5. After being unable to retrieve information,
the user can make a reasonable assumption about the possible lack of
information on a given subject.
Objective
3. User recognizes that no one source is comprehensive.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Given an information need, the user can
formulate a search strategy that utilizes a variety of resources to
achieve a comprehensive retrieval (e.g. reference sources, databases,
Internet resources).
- Enabling
Objective 1a.
After formulating his/her search strategy, the user can identify which
individual resources are likely to yield the most relevant information.
- Enabling Objective 1b. After identifying
the most relevant resources, the user can select which additional
resources will need to be consulted.
- Enabling
Objective 2. After using specific information sources,
the user can identify the strengths and limitations of coverage in each
source.
- Enabling
Objective 3. After examining several information sources,
the user can extract information from each source relevant to his or
her information need.
Objective
4. User can evaluate the quality and relevance of an information source.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Given an information source, the user can
identify the authors(s) and his or her credentials if provided in the
source [author is used as a generic term].
- Enabling
Objective 2. Given the name of an author, the user can
identify reference sources that may contain biographical information
about the author.
- Enabling
Objective 3. Given an information source, the user can
identify all necessary elements within the source that indicate the
treatment of information presented (e.g scholarly vs. magazine).
- Enabling
Objective 4. Within the user's field of study, the user
can list at least three core journals.
- Enabling
Objective 5. After examining the information, the user
can describe at least two features which contribute to the bias of that
information (e.g. author affiliation, publisher, date).
- Enabling
Objective 6. Within an information source, the user can
identify at least four elements that can be used to evaluate it (e.g.
date, publisher, author, methods, sources, statistics).
- Enabling
Objective 7. After examining a piece of information,
the user can analyze elements that aid in determining its purpose and
future use (e.g. research methodology, conclusions, supported arguments,
source for statistics).
Goal
6. User understands how to organize information effectively.
Objective
1. User is able to read, understand and create citations.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Given a list of references in various citation
formats, the user can list at least three elements common to most citation
formats (e.g. author, title, date).
- Enabling
Objective 1a.
User can list essential elements used to cite books (e.g. author, editor,
title, publisher, date).
- Enabling Objective 1b. User
can list essential elements used to cite articles (e.g. author, article
title, source, issue information, date).
- Enabling Objective 1c. User
can list essential elements used to cite other types of publications
(e.g. conference proceedings, legal documents, Internet resources
and standards).
- Enabling
Objective 2. Given a list of citations, the user can
distinguish different types of information and locate the original source
(e.g. book, article, Internet resource, conference proceedings).
- Enabling
Objective 2a.
User can distinguish between references to entire pieces of information
and parts of larger pieces (e.g. book vs. book chapter, journal vs.
journal article).
- Enabling Objective 2b. User can distinguish
between references to articles in scholarly journals, magazines,
and newspapers.
- Enabling
Objective 3. Within a given citation format, the user
can identify and cite a variety of sources (e.g. whole books, book chapters,
sections of pages from books, articles in periodicals, personal conversations,
papers presented at conferences, papers included in published conference
proceedings, ftp files, World Wide Web sources, e-mail).
- Enabling
Objective 4. Having obtained a variety of information
sources, the user can construct citations to this information in a standardized
format and incorporate these citations into his/her research report.
Objective
2. User can organize information into personal information files or systems.
- Enabling
Objective 1. Given a need to organize retrieved information,
the user can describe how different personal reference systems vary
in complexity and mechanism (e.g. might be paper bibliography or sophisticated
computer system).
- Enabling
Objective 2. After compiling a list of sources, the user
can identify an information management system that would aid in organizing
the sources for personal use.
- Enabling
Objective 3. After compiling a list of sources, the user
can demonstrate use of an information management system to organize
these sources for personal use.
Approved
by Libraries Faculty 12/5/95